<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Site Optimization 101 Part II : Wedding Photography Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/flash-site-optimization-101-part-ii-wedding-photography-search-engine-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/flash-site-optimization-101-part-ii-wedding-photography-search-engine-optimization</link>
	<description>Photography SEO &#124; Online Marketing 4 Pro Photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Holloway</title>
		<link>http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/flash-site-optimization-101-part-ii-wedding-photography-search-engine-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/?p=8#comment-75</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome! Flash certainly makes it easy to control the look and feel. I l prefer how your presence is setup with a blog and a &#039;portfolio&#039; site. 
Gotta have a blog these days for SEO (etc.), but many people make a good point about the need for a &#039;professional-looking&#039; site as opposed to simply the &#039;blog site&#039;. So, my opinion is that maintaining both is as good an idea as any. Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome! Flash certainly makes it easy to control the look and feel. I l prefer how your presence is setup with a blog and a &#8216;portfolio&#8217; site.<br />
Gotta have a blog these days for SEO (etc.), but many people make a good point about the need for a &#8216;professional-looking&#8217; site as opposed to simply the &#8216;blog site&#8217;. So, my opinion is that maintaining both is as good an idea as any. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradyo</title>
		<link>http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/flash-site-optimization-101-part-ii-wedding-photography-search-engine-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>bradyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photographers-marketing.com/bg/?p=8#comment-74</guid>
		<description>thanks for the tips, we really don&#039;t like using flash either, but we got too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the tips, we really don&#8217;t like using flash either, but we got too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

